Head to head
Lindy vs Relevance AI
A side-by-side, sourced comparison. Facts come from each vendor’s own materials; scores are our editorial opinion applied by the same rubric to both.
| Dimension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Plus $49.99/mo, Pro $99.99/mo, Max $199.99/mo, Enterprise custom. No free tier — a 7-day free trial (no card). Metered in credits (most tasks 1-3 credits on basic models, ~10 on large; minimum 1/task; no rollover).source ↗ | Usage-based on two units — an "Action" (a tool run) and "Vendor Credits" (model cost). Free sign-up includes a one-time 1,000 Vendor Credits plus 200 Actions/month; top-ups are $80 per 1,000 Actions and $20 per 10,000 Vendor Credits; Enterprise is contact-sales.source ↗ |
| Hosting model | Fully-managed cloud SaaS that connects to third-party apps; no self-host.source ↗ | Fully-managed cloud SaaS; no self-host option is documented.source ↗ |
| Memory & state | Uses personal context plus inbox/calendar context; a standalone long-term memory product is not described in the documentation we reviewed.Unverified | A "Knowledge" RAG feature — upload files or sync Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, and websites to ground agents.source ↗ |
| MCP support | Nonesource ↗ | Nativesource ↗ |
| Integrations | Marketed as 100+ integrations — Gmail, Outlook, Google Calendar, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Salesforce, Teams, and Zoom.source ↗ | The homepage cites 1,000+ apps (HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Gmail, LinkedIn, Apollo, Notion), with Enterprise referencing 2,000+.source ↗ |
| Model providers | Multi-model, selectable per agent; the docs reference GPT-4 and Claude, with Claude as the default.source ↗ | Multi-provider routing across Claude (Anthropic), Gemini (Google), and GPT (OpenAI).source ↗ |
| Open source | Nosource ↗ | Nosource ↗ |
| Developer experience(opinion) | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Pricing transparency & value(opinion) | 2/5 | 3/5 |
| Scalability(opinion) | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Memory & state(opinion) | 2/5 | 3/5 |
| Integrations(opinion) | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| MCP nativeness(opinion) | 0/5 | 5/5 |
The balanced view
Editorial opinion, derived from the scorecard above
Where Lindy scores higher
In our rubric, Lindy does not rate ahead of Relevance AI on any single dimension.
Where Relevance AI scores higher
In our rubric, Relevance AI rates ahead on pricing transparency & value, scalability, memory & state, integrations, mcp nativeness.
These two serve different needs — read the full dossiers for Lindy and Relevance AI before deciding. Neither has been hands-on tested by us yet.
Product and company names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used here only to identify the products under discussion.